Figurine: P’u-hsien (Samantabhadra), Patron God of Mt. Omi, China
2007.12.0008
Detailed Images
Basic Information
Artifact Identification | Figurine: P’u-hsien (Samantabhadra), Patron God of Mt. Omi, China (2007.12.0008) |
---|---|
Classification/ Nomenclature |
|
Artist/Maker | Unknown |
Geographic Location | |
Period | Reign of Kang Hsi (1662–1722), Qing Dynasty (1644-1911) |
Date | 17th - 18th Century |
Culture | Chinese |
Location | Not on Exhibit |
Physical Analysis
Dimension 1 (Height) | 13.5 cm |
---|---|
Dimension 2 (Width) | 10.5 cm |
Dimension 3 (N/A) | N/A |
Weight | 202 g |
Measuring Remarks | N/A |
Materials | Pigment--Stain, Plant--Bamboo |
Manufacturing Processes | Carved, Staining |
Research Remarks
Description | This is a Chinese wood carving of P'u-hsien, a bodhisattva (Buddhist holy man) and patron of Mount Omi in Szechuan. It is said that P'u-hsien was once challenged to a fight by a shape-shifting elephant (who turned into a man). The outcome was that the elephant was defeated and allowed P'u-hsien to ride upon his back. It is for this reason why P'u-hsien is often depicted as riding upon an elephant's back. In decorative arts, P'u-hsien has been portrayed as both masculine and feminine. Confucian, Daoist, and Buddhist influences were evident in the art pieces of the Qing. All three schools of thought instructed the people of the East Asian region on the ways (dao) which people could pursue in order to reach human fulfillment within the world or beyond it. Confucian values, however, gained support among government bureaucrats. As a code of ethics which stressed strict hierarchy and an adherence to matters within the world (fangnei) rather than matters beyond it (fangwai), Confucianism was considered the superior ideological system for an effective government structure. In fact, it was believed that the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644) fell as a result of an openness towards Daoist and Buddhist beliefs as this encouraged needless speculation and even corruption. This resulted in Qing Confucianism developing an empirical approach which valued knowledge acquisition over a common ground between regional beliefs. The carving technique of Chinese lacquer was a specialized practice due to the complicated drying process. Raw lacquer sap taken from the rhus tree species, particularly Rhus verniciflua, would not harden if applied too thickly, which meant that lacquer painting required a lengthy layering technique. Carved items of the commonly-used red lacquer style (ti hong) were not created until the Yuan Dynasty (1279-1368), and the lacquer manufacturing procedures are recorded for both the Yuan and early Ming (1368-1644) periods. A wooden base was covered with a thick layer of black lacquer (mixed with ash to promote hardening) which served as a smooth surface for the additional layers. A mixture of red and yellow layers, usually between 100 to 200, were then applied, and the artist then carved into these layers to produce a desired design. In order to indicate when the artist had to stop carving, several black layers would have been added as markers at an earlier point of the layering process. |
---|---|
Published Description | N/A |
Bibliography | Dursum, Brian A. et al. China’s Last Empire: The Art and Culture of the Qing Dynasty, 1644-1911. Coral Gables: Lowe Art Museum, 2014. |
Artifact History
Credit Line/Dedication | Fred A. Freund Collection |
---|---|
Reproduction | No |
Contact
All information about our collection is constantly reviewed and updated. Please contact Dery Martínez-Bonilla, Registrar, if there is any information you are looking for that isn't currently online.